S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08090
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mill Supply Company, LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08090 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir., binding in S.D.N.Y.) affirmed dismissal because plaintiffs must prove proposed modifications were 'effective,' a real risk here; but Holmes v. Bax shows ADA claims can survive summary judgment when properly pled. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - controls in S.D.N.Y. and raises plaintiff's burden to show effective accommodation, a common failure point in ADA website/accessibility suits. Main risk: Dismissal under Lowell's effectiveness-burden standard if plaintiff cannot show proposed accessibility fix would actually remedy the barrier. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$375K Small, heterogeneous comparable set; Mill Supply's small B2B profile makes it more analogous to single-plaintiff tester suits than the larger settled entities cited. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-17 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |