S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-08016
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bijora, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-08016 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Comparables are mostly off-topic (ECOA, employment, SNAP) but Lowell v. Lyft shows 2d Cir. requires plaintiffs to prove modifications are effective, a real dismissal risk for ADA claims in this circuit. Price v. Diab shows fee-shifting can attach even without full damages if injunctive relief is won. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — controls SDNY ADA reasoning; dismissed because plaintiff failed to prove proposed fix would be effective. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to show proposed accessibility modification is effective, per Lowell v. Lyft standard. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $3K–$50K Comparable set is largely non-analogous (ECOA, employment, SNAP); true ADA-accessibility precedent is thin (2 cases), so this estimate is a rough directional read, not a precise forecast. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-15 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |