← Records

Santiago v. The Liv Group Inc

W.D. Wash. · No. 3:26-cv-06041

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
The Liv Group Incsource ↗
filed by TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS PLLC · No. 3:26-cv-06041 · 28:1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾
Comparable pixel/tracking privacy claims split: Bayhealth confidentiality claim survived while Tower Health's Meta Pixel claim was dismissed with prejudice for undue delay. BIPA-style claims (Gunnar, Nuance) show similarly mixed outcomes depending on technical/statutory exclusions.
Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10
Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M
Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2)
Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M
Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — survived MTD on confidentiality/tracking tech theory, closest factual analog to wiretap-via-tracking claims against Liquid I.V.
Main risk: Dismissal on undue-delay/pleading grounds as in Tower Health, or exclusion under statutory carve-outs as in Nuance's BIPA financial-institution defense
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1.50M–$29M
No prior records on this defendant; class size and revenue figures are speculative from thin web signals; small comparable sample limits precision. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts
FilingPrivacy & WiretapW.D. Wash.2026-09-14$59.50M–$725M
comparable settlements