S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07991
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| International Greenhouse Contractors LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-07991 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Comparables split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal because plaintiffs failed to prove modifications were effective, while Holmes and Burton show ADA claims can survive summary judgment or mootness challenges. Billesdon shows accommodation claims often reversed absent strong evidence. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) matters most since it's a 2nd Cir. ADA ruling emphasizing plaintiff's burden to prove effective accommodation, directly binding in S.D.N.Y. Main risk: Failure to plead a specific, provably effective accessibility modification, as fatal in Lowell v. Lyft Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1K–$250K Small sample, no defendant-specific history, and unclear whether claim is individual tester suit or broader class; figures are rough anchors only. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-14 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |