S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07990
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emi-Jay, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-07990 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA website-accessibility suits split on outcome; Lowell v. Lyft shows plaintiffs must prove proposed fixes are effective, often dismissed, while Price v. Diab shows default/injunctive relief and fees can follow if defendant doesn't contest. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — affirmed dismissal, underscores plaintiff's burden to prove reasonable/effective accommodation, directly relevant to S.D.N.Y. ADA web-access theory. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to show proposed website fix would be effective, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$75K Small sample, no defendant history, and ADA Title III typically yields injunctive relief/fees not per-member damages, limiting precision. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-14 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |