E.D.N.Y · No. 1:26-cv-05651
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mukti 154 Petroleum Inc.source ↗ filed by Law Office of Jennifer E. Tucek, PC · Judge Nicholas Garaufis · No. 1:26-cv-05651 · 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾Comparable rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal of ADA claims for failure to prove reasonable modification, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations; Billesdon reversed ADA accommodation claims for insufficient evidence. Small single-location defendant with no prior ADA history increases uncertainty. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) is most relevant venue-wise (2d Cir/E.D.N.Y.) and shows plaintiffs bear burden of proving effective remedial modification, a common dismissal ground in accessibility suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective accessibility remedy, as in Lowell v. Lyft affirmance. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $100K–$500K Extremely small comparable sample, no class mechanism under ADA Title III, and no prior record on this defendant — figures are rough case-level, not per-member, estimates. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | E.D.N.Y | 2026-09-14 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |