E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-07016
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| POWER HOME REMODELING GROUP, LLCsource ↗ filed by Perrong Law LLC · Judge Kelley Brisbon Hodge · No. 2:26-cv-07016 · 47:227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $29.50M–$76M ▾TCPA robocall/text claims split sharply across comparables: Howard, Perrong, and Hulce all affirmed dismissal on technical statutory grounds (ATDS/prerecorded-voice definitions), while League of Women Voters v. Kramer survived a motion to dismiss with concrete injury allegations. Outcome likely hinges on whether Power's calls/texts meet post-Duguid ATDS or prerecorded-voice definitions. Comparable settlements $29.50M–$76M median $36.20M · n=10 Caribbean Cruise L $76M · Dish Network $61M · US Coachways $49.90M Per member (realized): ~$20 median · $10–$500 (n=4) Comparable verdict: Dish Network, L.L.C. $61M · ccAdvertising $32.42M Key precedent: Howard v. RNC (9th Cir.) - narrowed prerecorded-voice text liability, a direct technical hurdle for text-based TCPA claims like this one. Main risk: Dismissal on ATDS/prerecorded-voice technical definitions, as in Howard and Perrong, given narrowing post-Duguid TCPA case law. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $200K–$22.50M Small, heterogeneous comparable set spanning TCPA and VPPA theories; actual class size and call volume for this defendant unverified from web signals alone. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 3 verdicts | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | E.D. Pa. | 2026-09-14 | $29.50M–$76M comparable settlements |