← Records

Bishop v. Zapier, Inc.

S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07966

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
Zapier, Inc.source ↗
filed by Gottlieb & Associates · Judge Vernon Speede Broderick · No. 1:26-cv-07966 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾
Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) shows ADA website/service accessibility claims often fail without proof modifications are 'effective,' while Holmes v. Bax and Burton show ADA claims and injunctive relief can survive dismissal. Outcomes are highly fact-specific and split across comparables.
Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3
Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K
Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft — 2d Cir. affirmed dismissal of ADA claims where plaintiff failed to prove effectiveness of proposed accommodation, a likely hurdle for SaaS accessibility claims.
Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a plausible, effective accommodation/remediation, as in Lowell v. Lyft.
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $100K–$500K
Small comparable sample, no defendant-specific history, and ADA web accessibility suits usually resolve via injunctive/settlement lump sums rather than per-member damages. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts
FilingADA / AccessibilityS.D.N.Y.2026-09-12$65K–$530K
comparable settlements