S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07963
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabric Textile Products, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · Judge Arun Subramanian · No. 1:26-cv-07963 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $65K–$530K ▾ADA accessibility rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal where plaintiff failed to prove reasonable modification effectiveness, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment. Billesdon shows failure-to-accommodate claims often reversed on appeal, signaling merits vulnerability. Comparable settlements $65K–$530K median $200K · n=3 Covenant Retiremen $530K · Association of Apa $200K · Home Depot U.S.A., $65K Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) — controls burden-of-proof standard for ADA accessibility claims in this circuit, favoring early dismissal if plaintiff underpleads. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead/prove that requested accessibility modification is reasonable and effective, per Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$500K Small sample, no defendant history, and class size is speculative given lack of consumer-facing data for this B2B textile company. · grounded in 7 rulings, 3 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-12 | $65K–$530K comparable settlements |