E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-06697
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BALY LLC d/b/a FABRIKA BALY LLCsource ↗ filed by Costello & Silverman, LLC · No. 2:26-cv-06697 · 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Privacy/wiretap claims show inconsistent outcomes: Doe v. Bayhealth and Clements v. Gunnar Optiks survived motions to dismiss, while Santoro v. Tower Health and Cisneros v. Nuance were dismissed, reflecting fact-specific, technology-dependent rulings. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confirms tracking-tech disclosure claims can survive when a confidentiality duty is plausibly alleged, similar to Baly's likely web-tracking theory. Main risk: Dismissal risk mirrors Santoro v. Tower Health, where pixel/tracking claims failed for lack of individualized harm or consent theory clarity. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $30K–$1.75M Defendant identity is ambiguous (confused with unrelated Bally's Corp.); class size and per-member figures are highly speculative given sparse company-specific data. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-09-07 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |