M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-02588
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon.com Services, LLCsource ↗ filed by Imler Law · No. 8:26-cv-02588 · 28:451 Employment Discrimination · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy rulings split: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived on similar disclosure/consent theories, while Santoro and Nuance were dismissed on statutory-exemption or pleading grounds. The mismatch between the stated 'Privacy & Wiretap' theory and the actual class definition (illegal supplement sales) creates significant legal uncertainty about which framework governs. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Class (from complaint): All consumers who purchased dietary supplements from Amazon.com that were actually illegal, unapproved drugs during the relevant class period. Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — survived because defendant owed a recognized duty of confidentiality, showing courts will sustain privacy claims tied to concrete disclosure duties. Main risk: Theory/class mismatch could trigger dismissal for failure to state a cognizable privacy/wiretap claim, similar to Santoro's dismissal on pleading deficiencies Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2.70M–$47.25M Significant mismatch between 'Privacy & Wiretap' theory and supplement-fraud class definition undermines confident sizing; treat estimates as highly speculative. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-09-04 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |