C.D. Cal. · No. 8:26-cv-02535
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zepedasource ↗ filed by Open Access Law, APC · No. 8:26-cv-02535 · 42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA Title III accessibility suits against small businesses in M.D. Fla. often survive early motions but hinge on standing/mootness per Burton and effectiveness-of-remedy issues per Lowell v. Lyft. No damages are available under Title III, so value derives almost entirely from injunctive relief and fee-shifting. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — confirms fee entitlement for prevailing ADA plaintiffs even via default/injunctive relief, mirroring likely posture here. Main risk: Mootness/remediation defense (as in Burton) or failure to show reasonable, effective modification (as in Lowell v. Lyft) could defeat injunctive claim early. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$8K Web signals are irrelevant/noise (no verified defendant data); estimate relies on generic ADA Title III small-business litigation patterns, not case-specific facts. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | C.D. Cal. | 2026-09-04 | $2K–$8K rough EV |