D.S.C. · No. 4:26-cv-03895
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc.source ↗ filed by Hays Cauley PC · Judge Joseph Dawson III · No. 4:26-cv-03895 · 15:1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M ▾Privacy/wiretap claims tied to tracking tech show split outcomes: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived on similar theories, while Tower Health's Meta Pixel claim was dismissed with prejudice. Experian's case likely turns on similar factual questions about consent and data-sharing scope not resolvable at pleading stage. Comparable settlements $59.50M–$725M median $81.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google $425M · Google LLC $135M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Santoro v. Tower Health - dismissed pixel-based privacy claim, showing courts scrutinize whether shared data was truly identifiable/unauthorized. Main risk: Dismissal on pleading-stage grounds (lack of individualized harm/consent showing) as in Tower Health, or narrow statutory exclusion arguments like BIPA's HIPAA carve-out in Nuance. This defendant: Experian's litigation history is dominated by FCRA/FDCPA filings, not privacy/wiretap—no clear pattern for this theory. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $4M–$500M Single new filing with no defendant-specific privacy precedent; class scope and legal theory specifics unknown, producing wide uncertainty bands. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 4 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D.S.C. | 2026-09-04 | $59.50M–$725M comparable settlements |