S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07524
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smith Sport Optics, Inc.source ↗ filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC · No. 1:26-cv-07524 · 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparable ADA rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove reasonable modification, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations and Price v. Diab upheld injunctive relief. No web-accessibility-specific precedent here increases uncertainty for this Title III claim. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) matters most — same circuit, shows plaintiffs must prove effectiveness of proposed accommodation or face dismissal. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead specific, provable accessibility barriers, as in Lowell v. Lyft affirmance. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1K–$30K Small sample, no direct web-accessibility comparables or settlement data for this defendant; figures are rough proxies. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-02 | $1K–$30K rough EV |