S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-26059
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunshine Gasoline Distributors, Inc.source ↗ filed by Anthony J. Perez Law Group, PLLC · Judge Rodolfo Armando Ruiz II · No. 1:26-cv-26059 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA Title III accessibility suits like Lowell v. Lyft show courts require plaintiffs to prove effective remedies, risking dismissal, while Price v. Diab shows fee-shifting survives even on default judgment. Sunshine Gasoline is a small Miami operator, typical of single-location 'tester' ADA suits. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) - confirms ADA plaintiffs recover attorney's fees as prevailing party even absent full merits trial, key leverage in these suits. Main risk: Dismissal for lack of standing or failure to show non-speculative intent to return, as reasoning in Lowell v. Lyft suggests courts scrutinize remedy feasibility Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $3K–$75K No directly on-point ADA Title III accessibility rulings or settlements for this defendant; estimate relies on analogous case patterns and general Title III damages structure. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-09-02 | $3K–$75K rough EV |