M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-02560
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOJO LAKELAND QUE, LLCsource ↗ filed by Sconzo Law Office, P.A. · No. 8:26-cv-02560 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables are mostly off-topic (ECOA, rideshare WAV, employment ADA) with mixed outcomes; Lowell v. Lyft shows courts can dismiss ADA claims for lack of proof, while Holmes v. Bax shows ADA claims can survive summary judgment. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) - shows plaintiffs bear burden proving reasonableness/effectiveness of requested accommodation, a common failure point. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to show injury-in-fact or standing, or failure to prove requested modification effective (per Lowell v. Lyft). Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$15K No settlements/verdicts on this exact theory/defendant; comparables largely off-topic, so estimate is highly uncertain. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-09-02 | –$15K rough EV |