M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-02559
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOTANICAL BREWING COsource ↗ filed by Sconzo Law Office, P.A. · No. 8:26-cv-02559 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal where plaintiffs failed to prove reasonableness of modifications, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment. Small taproom defendants often settle quickly to avoid injunction/fee exposure like Price v. Diab. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - shows courts require plaintiffs to prove effectiveness of requested accommodation, a real dismissal risk here. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a plausible, effective accommodation/remediation theory, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$8K No case-specific facts, prior defendant history, or settlement data; estimate relies on generic ADA Title III litigation patterns for small businesses. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-09-02 | $2K–$8K rough EV |