E.D. Mo. · No. 4:26-cv-01408
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ratan, LLCsource ↗ filed by LAW OFFICE OF MICHELLE M FUNKENBUSCH · Judge Zachary M. Bluestone · No. 4:26-cv-01408 · 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA accessibility rulings are split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove effective modifications, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA claims and Price v. Diab upheld default/injunctive relief. Outcome is highly fact-dependent on standing and remedy feasibility. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — shows plaintiffs bear burden on reasonableness of requested accommodation, a common dismissal ground in ADA accessibility suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a plausible, effective accommodation/modification, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$10K Web signals are unrelated/noisy (mismatched 'Ratan' entities), so class size and defendant profile are highly uncertain; ADA Title III yields no per-member damages, only injunctive/fee recovery. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | E.D. Mo. | 2026-09-02 | $2K–$10K rough EV |