S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07496
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pervine Foods, LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-07496 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Lowell v. Lyft shows ADA/NYSHRL accessibility claims can be dismissed when plaintiffs fail to prove modification effectiveness, while Holmes v. Bax shows ADA claims can survive on summary judgment. S.D.N.Y. web-accessibility suits against small food companies often settle quickly to avoid injunction costs. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - controls S.D.N.Y. ADA accessibility pleading burden, requiring plaintiff to show proposed fix is effective. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft affirmance. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$12K Single-plaintiff ADA suits lack class damages; figures reflect settlement/fee exposure, not statutory per-member payouts. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-02 | $2K–$12K rough EV |