S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07491
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Goulet Pen Company, LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-07491 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Lowell v. Lyft shows courts require plaintiffs to prove proposed modifications are effective, a real dismissal risk for website-accessibility claims; but Price v. Diab shows even default/injunctive postures can yield fee awards, and SDNY ADA Title III 'tester' suits against small e-commerce sites rarely get dismissed outright pre-answer. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — controls burden-of-proof on reasonableness/effectiveness of accommodation, directly relevant to a website-accessibility ADA claim in the same circuit. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a plausible, effective remedial modification, as in Lowell v. Lyft, or lack of standing/mootness if site is remediated pre-litigation (cf. Burton mootness issue). Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $3K–$15K No settlements, verdicts, or defendant history on record; estimate rests on analogous ADA accessibility case law, not case-specific facts. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-01 | $3K–$15K rough EV |