S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07490
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryse Usa, Inc.source ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-07490 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾No directly on-point website-accessibility rulings exist in the comparables; Lowell v. Lyft shows courts will dismiss ADA claims where plaintiff fails to prove proposed remedy is effective, a real risk here. S.D.N.Y. is otherwise plaintiff-friendly on ADA Title III pleading standards for standing/injunctive claims. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) — shows 2d Cir. will affirm dismissal if plaintiff can't prove the requested accommodation/modification is effective, a burden analogous to website-remediation disputes. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective accessibility remedy, as in Lowell v. Lyft, or mootness if defendant remediates site pre-judgment. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$10K No settlements, verdicts, or defendant history on record; comparables are largely off-topic (employment, WAV, SNAP), so this estimate is a rough analogy, not a data-driven projection. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-01 | $2K–$10K rough EV |