S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07483
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EM Organics, LLCsource ↗ filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC · No. 1:26-cv-07483 · 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA accessibility claims show mixed outcomes: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment. Small defendant with no prior ADA litigation history increases uncertainty on outcome. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - controlling circuit precedent requiring plaintiff prove proposed accessibility fix is reasonable/effective, a high pleading bar in SDNY. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a specific, effective accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft affirmance. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1K–$188K No settlement or verdict data specific to this theory/defendant; estimate relies on loosely analogous ADA rulings and small-company web signals, not direct comparables. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-09-01 | $1K–$188K rough EV |