E.D. Mo. · No. 4:26-cv-01395
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HST-STL LLCsource ↗ filed by SULAIMAN LAW GROUP LTD · No. 4:26-cv-01395 · 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $51.75M–$725M ▾Comparable rulings split: privacy/confidentiality claims survived in Doe v. Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks (BIPA), but were dismissed in Tower Health (Meta Pixel) and Nuance (BIPA exemption). Outcome likely hinges on fact-specific consent/disclosure issues not yet clear for HST-STL. Comparable settlements $51.75M–$725M median $63.75M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google LLC $135M · Google LLC and Alp $68M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confirms healthcare-adjacent confidentiality/tracking-tech claims can survive MTD if a duty analogous to physician-patient relationship is pled. Main risk: Dismissal on exemption/duty grounds similar to Tower Health or Nuance, where statutory/regulatory carve-outs defeated privacy claims outright. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $14K–$580K Defendant identity is ambiguous from web signals (possible small local business vs. larger entity), and small sample size limits confidence in both survival and value estimates. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 3 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Mo. | 2026-08-31 | $51.75M–$725M comparable settlements |