M.D. Fla. · No. 6:26-cv-01937
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| La Petite Academy, Inc.source ↗ filed by The Montone Law Firm, P.A. · Judge Julie Sneed · No. 6:26-cv-01937 · 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $51.75M–$725M ▾Comparable rulings split: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks let privacy/tracking claims survive, while Tower Health's Meta Pixel claim and Integris's core disclosure claim were dismissed or left unclear. No case directly involves childcare-sector wiretap claims, limiting precedential fit. Comparable settlements $51.75M–$725M median $63.75M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google LLC $135M · Google LLC and Alp $68M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$29 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confidentiality claim survived where defendant used tracking tech to disclose sensitive personal info, a plausible analog if La Petite's claim involves app/website tracking. Main risk: Dismissal on pleading grounds akin to Tower Health/Santoro, where Meta Pixel-style disclosure claims failed for lack of individualized harm or consent theory gaps Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $375K–$3.50M Small sample of directly relevant rulings, no defendant-specific history, and class size is inferred from generic web signals rather than confirmed user/customer counts. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 3 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | M.D. Fla. | 2026-08-31 | $51.75M–$725M comparable settlements |