E.D.N.Y · No. 1:26-cv-05381
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 225 Leo Realty LLCsource ↗ filed by Law Office of Jennifer E. Tucek, PC · Judge Hector Gonzalez · No. 1:26-cv-05381 · 28:1343 Violation of Civil Rights · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) shows ADA accessibility claims can be dismissed if plaintiff fails to prove proposed modifications are effective, while Holmes v. Bax shows ADA claims often survive at summary judgment when well-pled. Outcome likely hinges on specificity of alleged barriers and remediation feasibility. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) — controlling circuit precedent placing burden on plaintiff to show reasonableness/effectiveness of accommodation, directly relevant to E.D.N.Y. ADA accessibility suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective accessibility modification, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$8K Extremely limited defendant-specific data; single-plaintiff ADA accessibility suits rarely resemble class actions, so EV estimate is highly speculative. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | E.D.N.Y | 2026-08-31 | –$8K rough EV |