← Records

NASIR v. GDI SERVICES INC.

E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-06497

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
GDI SERVICES INC.source ↗
filed by Feasterville-Trevose, PA 19053 · Judge Kelley Brisbon Hodge · No. 2:26-cv-06497 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $29.50M–$76M ▾
TCPA robocall claims show mixed outcomes: Howard, Perrong, and Hulce all resulted in dismissal or affirmance for defendants, while League of Women Voters survived a motion to dismiss on similar robocall theory. GDI Services is a facility-services company, suggesting smaller commercial call volume than typical telecom/bank defendants in large settlements.
Comparable settlements $29.50M–$76M median $36.20M · n=10
Caribbean Cruise L $76M · Dish Network $61M · US Coachways $49.90M
Per member (realized): ~$20 median · $10–$500 (n=4)
Comparable verdict: Dish Network, L.L.C. $61M · ccAdvertising $32.42M
Key precedent: Hulce v. Zipongo - 7th Cir. affirmed that non-solicitation calls/texts don't trigger TCPA, a plausible defense if GDI's texts were service-related, not marketing.
Main risk: Dismissal on grounds that calls/texts were non-marketing or that GDI lacks 'initiation' under TCPA, per Howard and Hulce reasoning.
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $6K–$675K
No prior record on defendant; class size is speculative from generic web signals, not actual call logs or litigation filings. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 3 verdicts
FilingRobocalls & Texts (TCPA)E.D. Pa.2026-08-31$29.50M–$76M
comparable settlements