S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-25992
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TACO CHIC, LLCsource ↗ filed by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC · Judge Roy Kalman Altman · No. 1:26-cv-25992 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA Title III accessibility suits split heavily on outcome: Lowell v. Lyft shows dismissal where plaintiffs fail to prove effective modifications, while Price v. Diab shows plaintiffs can win injunctive relief plus fees even on default. Small single-location defendants like Taco Chic often settle fast rather than litigate. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — dismissal affirmed because plaintiff bore burden of proving reasonableness/effectiveness of requested accommodation, a common failure point in ADA access suits. Main risk: Plaintiff fails to plead/prove a specific, effective architectural or digital modification, risking dismissal as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$22K No settlement or verdict data specific to this theory/defendant; estimate relies on general S.D. Fla. ADA Title III settlement norms and small, mixed comparable set. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-31 | $2K–$22K rough EV |