S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-25988
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC.source ↗ filed by Law Office of Ely Gonzalez, P.A. · Judge David S. Leibowitz · No. 1:26-cv-25988 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA rulings in the comparable set are mixed: Price v. Diab affirmed plaintiff-favorable default/injunctive relief while Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove reasonableness, showing outcome hinges heavily on specific accessibility facts pled. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) matters most — shows ADA accessibility claims can secure injunctive relief and fee-shifting even via default, raising Publix's exposure to fee awards. Main risk: Lowell v. Lyft shows courts dismiss ADA claims when plaintiff fails to prove proposed remedy is effective/reasonable — a similar pleading gap could sink this case. This defendant: Publix has prior ADA filing (Otto) and a separate settlement (White/Bogach), suggesting recurring accessibility litigation exposure. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$75K No theory-specific settlements or verdicts on record; comparables are largely tangential (ECOA, rideshare WAV, employment ADA), limiting predictive precision. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-31 | $5K–$75K rough EV |