M.D. Fla. · No. 6:26-cv-01922
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOYTAKO, LLCsource ↗ filed by Sconzo Law Office, P.A. · No. 6:26-cv-01922 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables are loosely analogous: Lowell v. Lyft shows ADA accessibility claims often dismissed absent proof of effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax shows ADA claims can survive when paired with strong factual records. No settlements or verdicts specific to this defendant or claim type exist to anchor value. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. (2d Cir.) — affirmed dismissal because plaintiff bore burden to show proposed accommodation was reasonable/effective, a common failure point in ADA accessibility suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a plausible, effective remediation/accommodation, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$10K Web signals are largely irrelevant/noisy (unrelated companies), no verified defendant size or class data; estimate relies on general ADA Title III litigation patterns, not case-specific facts. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-08-28 | $2K–$10K rough EV |