M.D. Fla. · No. 8:26-cv-02534
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZONG TEA, LLCsource ↗ filed by Sconzo Law Office, P.A. · No. 8:26-cv-02534 · Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA accessibility suits show mixed outcomes: Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations while Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove reasonableness of proposed modifications, showing outcome hinges on specificity of alleged barriers. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — dismissal affirmed because plaintiffs failed to prove requested accommodation was reasonable/effective, a common pleading pitfall in ADA suits. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a concrete, effective accommodation/barrier, as in Lowell v. Lyft Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$38K No settlements or verdicts on this exact defendant/theory combo; estimate relies on general ADA Title III litigation patterns, not case-specific data. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | M.D. Fla. | 2026-08-28 | $2K–$38K rough EV |