S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-25949
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALICO CANAL PROPERTIES LLCsource ↗ filed by Anthony J. Perez Law Group, PLLC · No. 1:26-cv-25949 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA accessibility rulings split: Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations while Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove reasonable modification, showing outcome hinges heavily on specific facts and remedy sought. Price v. Diab shows even default wins can lose fee entitlement on appeal. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft — dismissal affirmed because plaintiff bore burden to prove proposed accommodation was effective, a common failure point in ADA accessibility pleadings. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to plead a plausible, effective remedy, as in Lowell v. Lyft, or loss of fee entitlement even after favorable outcome, as in Price v. Diab Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$8K Web signals are unrelated to this defendant (generic 'Calico' networking/brand hits), so class-size and defendant-pattern data are essentially absent; estimate relies on generalized ADA Title III litigation patterns, not case-specific facts. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-28 | $2K–$8K rough EV |