D.S.C. · No. 1:26-cv-03744
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acrisure Mortgage LLCsource ↗ filed by Dave Maxfield, Attorney, LLC · Judge Mary Geiger Lewis · No. 1:26-cv-03744 · 15:1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M ▾Privacy/wiretap claims show split outcomes: Bayhealth and Gunnar (remand) survived pleading stage, while Cisneros and Santoro were dismissed on statutory exemptions or standing grounds. No case directly involves mortgage-call recording, adding uncertainty to Acrisure's specific exposure. Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M median $63.75M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google LLC $135M · Google LLC and Alp $68M Per member (realized): ~$29 median · $29–$30 (n=3) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425.65M Key precedent: Gunnar Optiks (7th Cir.) - shows wiretap/privacy claims often survive MTD when factual questions about consent/exclusions remain unresolved. Main risk: Dismissal via statutory exemption or lack of individualized harm, as in Cisneros (BIPA financial-institution exemption) and Santoro (Meta Pixel dismissed) Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $125K–$2.50M Small, non-mortgage-specific comparable set; class size and per-member figures are rough proxies, not case-specific data. · grounded in 8 rulings, 10 settlements, 3 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D.S.C. | 2026-08-28 | $47.50M–$725M comparable settlements |