S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-25937
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BREITLING U.S.A. INCsource ↗ filed by Brasil , Brasil PA · No. 1:26-cv-25937 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables split: Lowell v. Lyft shows courts dismiss ADA claims when plaintiff fails to prove reasonable modification, while Holmes v. Bax and Price v. Diab show ADA claims and fee awards can survive/succeed. S.D. Fla. is a high-volume forum for ADA Title III website suits, often resolved quickly. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) — shows plaintiff bears burden on reasonableness/effectiveness of modification, a common defense in accessibility suits like this one. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to show injury-in-fact/standing or failure to prove effective modification, as in Lowell v. Lyft. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$8K No settlement or verdict data specific to Breitling or this exact claim; estimate relies on general S.D. Fla. ADA litigation patterns and small comparable sample. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-28 | $2K–$8K rough EV |