S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-25925
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Famous Dave's of America, Inc.source ↗ filed by Brasil , Brasil PA · Judge Rodney Smith · No. 1:26-cv-25925 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables are mostly outside ADA public-accommodation context; Lowell v. Lyft shows courts will dismiss ADA claims where plaintiff can't prove effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax shows ADA claims can survive summary judgment when well-supported. No direct Title III accessibility precedent in the sample weakens predictive strength. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft, Inc. — shows ADA accessibility claims can be dismissed if plaintiff fails burden on reasonableness/effectiveness of requested accommodation, a common defense in S.D. Fla. ADA suits. Main risk: Standing/mootness dismissal common in S.D. Fla. ADA 'tester' suits, plus Lowell-style failure to prove requested fix is required or effective. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$11K Sample lacks any direct ADA Title III public-accommodation comparables; estimate relies on general litigation pattern knowledge, not the provided rulings. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-28 | $2K–$11K rough EV |