S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-25913
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUAMA II, LLCsource ↗ filed by Anthony J. Perez Law Group, PLLC · Judge Roy Kalman Altman · No. 1:26-cv-25913 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparable rulings split: Lowell v. Lyft affirmed dismissal for failure to prove effective modification, while Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment. Outcome is fact-specific and turns on barrier proof and standing at pleading stage. Key precedent: Lowell v. Lyft (2d Cir.) - plaintiffs bear burden to prove proposed accommodation is effective; failure to do so is fatal, relevant to accessibility barrier claims here. Main risk: Dismissal for lack of standing or failure to plead a concrete, plausible barrier, as seen in Lowell v. Lyft's affirmed dismissal. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$15K No settlement or verdict data specific to this theory/defendant; web signals are noisy/unrelated, class size assumed as single plaintiff typical of Title III ADA suits. · grounded in 7 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-28 | $5K–$15K rough EV |