E.D. Cal. · No. 1:26-cv-06842
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coralreef Productions, Inc.source ↗ filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC · Judge Jennifer L. Thurston · No. 1:26-cv-06842 · 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA Title III accessibility suits like this typically survive dismissal given low pleading bar (Price v. Diab shows courts readily grant relief/fees on default), but ADA itself provides only injunctive relief, not damages, limiting monetary exposure absent NY state-law claims. Class (from complaint): All blind or visually-impaired persons who have been denied access to AG Jeans' website www.agjeans.com. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — confirms plaintiffs securing injunctive relief in ADA accessibility suits are 'prevailing parties' entitled to fees, raising defendant's cost exposure beyond damages. Main risk: Mootness/remediation defense — many ADA website suits are dismissed or settled cheaply once defendant remediates site, per common S.D.N.Y. pattern. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$250K Highly uncertain: no settlement data, unclear if suit is single-plaintiff or true class, and ADA alone yields no damages absent state-law overlay. · grounded in 2 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | Robocalls & Texts (TCPA) | E.D. Cal. | 2026-08-26 | –$250K rough EV |