E.D. Mo. · No. 4:26-cv-01361
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ascension Health Alliancesource ↗ filed by PEIFFER WOLF LLP - St. Louis · Judge Catherine D. Perry · No. 4:26-cv-01361 · 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M ▾Analogous tracking-technology privacy claims split: Bayhealth's confidentiality claim survived MTD while Integris's state-law privacy claims remained unresolved after remand. No case law directly on Ascension, so outcome is fact-dependent on data-sharing specifics. Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M median $63.75M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google LLC $135M · Google $68M Per member (realized): ~$30 median · $29–$30 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — nearly identical theory (healthcare provider disclosing health data via tracking tech) survived MTD in part, showing viability of confidentiality claims. Main risk: Dismissal for lack of concrete injury/standing or failure to show unauthorized disclosure, as seen in Integris where state claims stayed unresolved post-remand. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $25M–$150M Small comparable set, no Ascension-specific rulings, and class size is a rough extrapolation from company scale, not confirmed litigation data. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Mo. | 2026-08-26 | $47.50M–$725M comparable settlements |