E.D.N.Y · No. 1:26-cv-05260
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land & Shore Creative LLCsource ↗ filed by Helen F. Dalton & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-05260 · 28:1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M ▾Comparable rulings split: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks (7th Cir.) let privacy/tracking claims survive dismissal, while Integris and LabCorp show courts scrutinizing statutory/technical theories closely. Small defendant with no litigation history adds uncertainty on both liability and ability to pay. Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M median $63.75M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google LLC $135M · Google $68M Per member (realized): ~$30 median · $29–$30 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: William Clements v. Gunnar Optiks LLC (7th Cir.) - vacated dismissal, showing wiretap/data-collection claims often survive pleading stage pending factual development. Main risk: Court dismisses under a technical exclusion or standing gap, as partially seen in LabCorp and Integris rulings on statutory/procedural grounds. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $25K–$450K Tiny sample of prior rulings/settlements involving large tech firms; scaling down to a small LLC defendant is speculative and class size is unconfirmed. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D.N.Y | 2026-08-26 | $47.50M–$725M comparable settlements |