D. Or. · No. 3:26-cv-01776
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Family Insurance Companysource ↗ filed by Property Claims Attorneys · Judge Amy M. Baggio · No. 3:26-cv-01776 · 28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M ▾Comparables split: Bayhealth survived a confidentiality claim against a healthcare-type defendant, while Integris and LabCorp show dismissal risk on privacy/disclosure theories; Gunnar Optiks shows factual questions often defeat early dismissal, cutting both ways for a wiretap-style claim against an insurer. Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M median $63.75M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google LLC $135M · Google $68M Per member (realized): ~$30 median · $29–$30 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — confidentiality claim from tracking tech survived MTD, suggesting insurer's use of tracking/pixels could similarly survive if a duty analog exists. Main risk: Dismissal for failure to show interception/disclosure meets wiretap statute definitions, as in LabCorp's narrow reading of governing regulations. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $6.25M–$52.50M Class size and per-member figures are rough extrapolations from limited comparables and defendant scale; no case-specific class definition or damages model available yet. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | D. Or. | 2026-08-26 | $47.50M–$725M comparable settlements |