C.D. Cal. · No. 2:26-cv-09496
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universal Art Gallery Inc.source ↗ filed by So Cal Equal Access Group · Judge Michael Walter Fitzgerald · No. 2:26-cv-09496 · 42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾ADA accessibility claims often survive pleading stage per Holmes v. Bax (ADA claims affirmed) but fee/prevailing-party issues are frequently contested as in Price v. Diab and Burton, showing courts scrutinize remedy scope even after liability is found. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — shows even default/injunctive ADA wins face reversal on fee entitlement, signaling remedy-stage risk here. Main risk: Single small business defendant likely lacks resources for large payout; case may resemble serial ADA tester suit with limited class exposure. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$9K No settlement or verdict data specific to this defendant/theory; estimate relies on general ADA/Unruh small-business patterns, not direct comparables. · grounded in 5 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | C.D. Cal. | 2026-08-25 | $2K–$9K rough EV |