S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07264
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SuperJeweler.com, Inc.source ↗ filed by Joseph & Norinsberg, LLC · Judge John George Koeltl · No. 1:26-cv-07264 · 42:12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparable rulings show ADA accessibility claims often survive dismissal (Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations) but fee-shifting and remedy scope remain contested (Price v. Diab, Burton). No direct SuperJeweler precedent exists. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — clarifies prevailing-party fee entitlement even on default judgment, relevant if SuperJeweler defaults or settles quickly. Main risk: Attorney's-fee disputes and mootness defenses (as in Burton) could limit recovery even if injunctive relief is granted. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $3K–$18K No SuperJeweler-specific or settlement data; estimate relies on generic ADA web-accessibility litigation patterns, not verified figures. · grounded in 5 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-25 | $3K–$18K rough EV |