S.D. Fla. · No. 1:26-cv-25803
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Citi Trends, Inc.source ↗ filed by Law Office of Pelayo Duran, PA · Judge Jacqueline Becerra · No. 1:26-cv-25803 · 42:12182 Americans with Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables show ADA claims often survive merits (Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations) but fee-shifting/prevailing-party issues remain contested (Price v. Diab, Burton v. Chase Point). No direct Title III retail-access precedent in this set, raising uncertainty. Key precedent: Price v. Diab - confirms ADA plaintiffs can recover fees even via default judgment, but fee entitlement itself was reversed on appeal, showing fee awards are contestable. Main risk: ADA Title III bars compensatory damages entirely; suit likely resolves via injunctive relief/fee award only, capping monetary exposure regardless of survival. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$9K Small, non-analogous comparable set; no ADA Title III retail-access rulings or settlements directly on point; figures are rough proxies from fee-shifting case law. · grounded in 5 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D. Fla. | 2026-08-25 | –$9K rough EV |