S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07170
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taboola.Com Ltd.source ↗ filed by Glancy Prongay Wolke & Rotter LLP · No. 1:26-cv-07170 · 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M ▾Tracking-technology privacy claims show split outcomes: Doe v. Bayhealth survived MTD on breach of confidentiality via tracking tech, while Gunnar Optiks (BIPA) was remanded on factual questions rather than resolved. Integris Health shows analogous third-party data-sharing claims left 'unclear', signaling courts are cautious but not dismissive. Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M median $59.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google Assistant $68M · Google LLC and Alp $68M Per member (realized): ~$30 median · $29–$30 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — survived MTD for tracking-tech disclosure, most factually analogous to Taboola's ad-tech data collection. Main risk: Doe v. Integris Health left state-law tracking-disclosure claims 'unclear', showing courts may narrow third-party sharing theories absent direct provider relationship Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $40M–$700M Small comparable sample (n=6 rulings, n=2 per-member benchmark) spans multiple statutes/jurisdictions; true class size and S.D.N.Y.-specific wiretap outcome remain speculative. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-21 | $47.50M–$725M comparable settlements |