C.D. Cal. · No. 2:26-cv-09371
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blossom Floral, INC.source ↗ filed by So Cal Equal Access Group · No. 2:26-cv-09371 · 42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables are mostly off-theory (ECOA, HOA, SNAP) but show courts often affirm ADA liability once established, as in Holmes v. Bax; Price v. Diab confirms ADA default judgments and injunctive relief are readily upheld, though fee awards can be contested. Key precedent: Price v. Diab — confirms ADA accessibility default judgments and injunctive relief are affirmed even if fee-shifting is separately litigated. Main risk: Single-plaintiff/tester dismissal for lack of standing or mootness, similar to mootness issues raised in Burton v. Chase Point. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$7K No direct ADA-accessibility settlement or verdict data; estimate relies on tangential comparables and general Unruh Act norms, not defendant-specific facts. · grounded in 5 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | C.D. Cal. | 2026-08-21 | $2K–$7K rough EV |