← Records

Tapias v. First Choice Auto Body & Repair, Inc

C.D. Cal. · No. 2:26-cv-09359

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
First Choice Auto Body & Repair, Incsource ↗
filed by Open Access Law, APC · No. 2:26-cv-09359 · 42:12101 Americans With Disabilities Act · view case timeline →
Case comparables ▾
Holmes v. Bax affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment, showing courts sustain well-pled ADA accessibility claims, while Price v. Diab and Burton show fee/mootness issues often complicate recovery post-injunction. No direct accessibility-specific ruling on this defendant exists.
Key precedent: Holmes v. Bax (8th Cir.) - affirms ADA liability can survive dispositive motions when access barriers are shown, relevant baseline for merits survival.
Main risk: Single-location ADA claims often resolve via quick injunctive fix + fee dispute (Price v. Diab), limiting monetary exposure and inviting mootness defenses (Burton).
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $4K–$60K
No settlements, verdicts, or defendant-specific priors exist; estimate relies on generic ADA/Unruh statutory anchors and small, tangential comparable set. · grounded in 5 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts
FilingADA / AccessibilityC.D. Cal.2026-08-21$4K–$60K
rough EV