S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07144
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GoDaddy Inc.source ↗ filed by Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP · No. 1:26-cv-07144 · 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M ▾Comparable privacy rulings split: Bayhealth and Gunnar Optiks survived on tracking/data-collection theories, while Integris was dismissed on procedural (removal) grounds with underlying privacy claims left unclear. No wiretap-specific ruling squarely favors either side, so outcome is fact-dependent on GoDaddy's data practices. Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M median $59.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google Assistant $68M · Google LLC and Alp $68M Per member (realized): ~$30 median · $29–$30 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — survived MTD on confidentiality/tracking-tech disclosure theory, closest analog to a wiretap/privacy claim against a service provider. Main risk: Dismissal on threshold consent/standing grounds, as seen in Integris where procedural posture defeated privacy claims before reaching merits. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2.50M–$300M Small comparable sample, no GoDaddy-specific precedent, and class size/per-member figures are rough proxies from unrelated tech settlements. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-21 | $47.50M–$725M comparable settlements |