S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07125
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ana Luisa Retail LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-07125 · 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Price v. Diab confirms ADA plaintiffs can secure fee awards even via default judgment, and Holmes v. Bax shows ADA claims often survive summary judgment, but neither involves retail website accessibility specifically, limiting direct applicability. Key precedent: Price v. Diab (9th Cir.) — establishes fee-shifting recovery path for ADA plaintiffs even without contested litigation, relevant to likely injunctive/fee resolution here. Main risk: Mootness if defendant remediates site quickly, similar to how Holmes v. Bax required vacating injunctive relief for inadequate remedy analysis. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $5K–$25K Small, non-analogous comparable set (mostly non-ADA); true value hinges on fee-shifting and remediation timing, not class damages. · grounded in 4 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-21 | $5K–$25K rough EV |