S.D.N.Y. · No. 1:26-cv-07123
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Summit Safety, LLCsource ↗ filed by Gottlieb & Associates · No. 1:26-cv-07123 · 28:1331 Fed. Question · view case timeline → Case comparables ▾Comparables are mostly off-theory (ECOA, SNAP, wage claims); only Price v. Diab and Holmes v. Bax involve ADA and both favored plaintiffs, suggesting courts are receptive to ADA claims surviving early stages. Key precedent: Holmes v. Bax (8th Cir.) affirmed ADA violations at summary judgment, showing ADA claims can survive well past pleading if well-pled. Main risk: Vacated injunction in Holmes shows courts scrutinize remedy scope; Price v. Diab shows fee awards can be reversed even after merits win. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): –$125K No settlement or verdict data specific to ADA accessibility claims against this defendant; estimates rely on generic ADA litigation patterns and thin comparable set. · grounded in 4 rulings, 0 settlements, 0 verdicts | Filing | ADA / Accessibility | S.D.N.Y. | 2026-08-20 | –$125K rough EV |