← Records

Albright v. LINEAFLEXO LLC.

S.D. Fla. · No. 0:26-cv-62307

Full docket on CourtListener ↗

No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).

Our records for this case (1)

MatterTypePractice areaCourtDateValue
LINEAFLEXO LLC.source ↗
filed by Joshua Feygin, PLLC / Sue Your Dealer A Law Firm · No. 0:26-cv-62307 · 15:1981 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer) · view case timeline →
Comparable settlements $90M–$586M ▾
No comparables directly involve false advertising against a small regional defendant; closest analogues (Citizens of Humanity 'Made in USA' labeling, Guthrie UCL, Cetorelli CSPA) show mixed outcomes ranging from affirmed dismissal to affirmed liability. LineaFlexo appears to be a small Pompano Beach automotive business, not a national brand, so mega-settlement comparables are likely inapplicable.
Comparable settlements $90M–$586M median $90M · n=10
Western Union $586M · Toyota Industries $436M · Credit Glory $200M
Comparable verdict: Papaya $420M · VPX, Inc. $293M
Key precedent: Citizens of Humanity v. Donboli - shows false-advertising/labeling claims can fail for lack of probable cause, illustrating vulnerability of thin factual pleadings.
Main risk: Small local defendant with limited class size and revenue; claim may fail at pleading stage for lack of specific misrepresentation, as in Citizens of Humanity.
Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $2K–$1.25M
Comparables are largely unrelated theories/defendant sizes; web signals suggest a small local business, making national settlement benchmarks unreliable anchors. · grounded in 10 rulings, 10 settlements, 9 verdicts
FilingFalse AdvertisingS.D. Fla.2026-08-20$90M–$586M
comparable settlements