E.D. Pa. · No. 2:26-cv-06114
Full docket on CourtListener ↗
No federal docket timeline hydrated for this case yet (state-court settlements have no RECAP docket).
| Matter | Type | Practice area | Court | Date | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.source ↗ filed by Keller Postman LLC · No. 2:26-cv-06114 · 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability · view case timeline → Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M ▾Doe v. Bayhealth shows confidentiality/tracking-tech claims can survive MTD, and Gunnar Optiks shows courts often defer dismissal pending factual development on tracking tech; but Integris Health shows privacy claims sometimes remain 'unclear' post-remand and jurisdictional fights persist. Comparable settlements $47.50M–$725M median $59.50M · n=10 Meta $725M · Google Assistant $68M · Google LLC and Alp $68M Per member (realized): ~$30 median · $29–$30 (n=2) Comparable verdict: Google LLC $425.70M · Google LLC $425M Key precedent: Doe v. Bayhealth Medical Ctr. — healthcare provider tracking-tech disclosure claim survived MTD, closely analogous to pharma website tracking theory here. Main risk: Dismissal on loss-causation/standing grounds (per LabCorp-style reasoning) or removal/jurisdictional dismissal as in Integris Health if BI raises similar defenses. Rough EV model (wide — class size is the big unknown, not a prediction): $1.25M–$30M Six parallel filings against BI on same theory suggest consolidation likely, which could shift class size/value substantially; sample size for rulings/settlements is small. · grounded in 6 rulings, 10 settlements, 2 verdicts | Filing | Privacy & Wiretap | E.D. Pa. | 2026-08-20 | $47.50M–$725M comparable settlements |